Archive for the ‘Hong Kong’ Category

 

Forced opt-in by the French government

Yesterday, quietly minding my own things, I received a strange email in my personal inbox:

From: Nicolas_lassus@yahoo.com (That’s me! … usually a sign of a spam email or virus)

Subject: (French Consulate in Hong Kong and Macau) Confirmation (in French of course)

Email from French Consulate

Seeing the subject line I thought that the consulate was reminding me that my new passport I requested was sitting in their drawers waiting for me to pick it up… but wrong I was! Although I cannot recall ticking a box saying I want to receive anything from my dear Consulate when I applied for a passport a month ago (my last interaction with the consulate), here I get a “confirmation” for my subscription to the Consulate information newsletter.

Luckily there is a link for me to modify my subscription in the email. This leads to a page where I can choose between HTML and text format, and where I can unsubscribe. Note though how the link says “modify your subscription” and not “if you want to unsubscribe bla bla bla”. But then I stop… would unsubscribing from this newsletter make me a bad citizen? Will the government flag me and check my tax receipts for omissions (I actually never worked in my own country, and thus never had a tax declaration done there)? Anyway. I decided that it was safer for me to at least pick up my passport before removing my name from the distribution list… or at least see what the first newsletter will look like.

It is funny how governments in the UK and Canada seem to be at the forefront of user experience and accessibility… and how the French government still does not get the concept of letting users opt-in to a newsletter… scary!

Airgini launches private Alpha…

AirginiAirgini has just launched its private alpha version. Airgini is a Hong Kong born mobile social networking application. It is great to see product innovation and development in Hong Kong. There are too few of those.

So, all the best to the Airgini team!

Social Networking: The growth dilemma…

I recently did some work for a mobile social networking start-up here in Hong Kong helping them with their interface and their user experience in general. Although my focus was on the interface (and the project very short as usual) we happened to talk quite a bit about strategy. In fact, I always find it hard to focus on user experience and user interface without poking my nose into the overall strategy behind them (I’d like to spend more time on that, but it is not the point of this post… maybe for a later one).

Anyway, it seems to me that there is a tough dilemma when building a social network. The problem is that the number of users and the amount of interactions going on in the network is everything. Indeed for most social networks (excluding a few business-related or referral-based ones), the networks do not have a clear revenue model. As everything is advertising-based the indicators to get funding and be recognized in the industry are basically number of users and page views. Unfortunately, these indicators in some cases go against user goals and go against the long term survival of the network.

We are now all used to this. We grow a social network and at first all is going well. We have our close friends there and we are having fun exchanging news, pictures, videos, etc. However after a while, our network grows, previous friends, former colleagues, people we actually met via our social network gets added and all goes out of control. Indeed the whole concept is based on encouraging users to “make” more friends. Games are put in place to push them to add people to their network, and simply when somebody asks sombody to be his or her friend it is really hard to say no. It feels like a no return kind of decision. Even though we might never meet the person in real, we just cannot say no to people that easily. And once they are added to our network, we have little control over what they do with their access to our information, thus the beginning of the end and often users drop-out from the network.

Although it means taking more time to grow the network it seems to me that social networks should learn from real life more. Instead of just facing a “friend” or “not friend” situation, users should be able to grow relationships slower and keeping them under their control without feeling like they are making others feel bad (or having themselves the perception that they could make the other person feel bad). It works in this way in the real world. When we meet somebody for the first time, we do not usually invite them home to look at our family pictures or read our private diary. It is just normal that relationships take time to build. It should be the same online. It is of great convenience to be able to exchange information with friends online, but users should not pay the price of this by losing their right to privacy… and if social networks do not realize this, they will all sooner or later face the fact that when the hype is gone, people will choose privacy over convenience.

With all this said, the problem still remains. In a short term focus world like the one we live in, we demand quick results and a slow growing network just does not make sense… or does it?

Funny sign translation: My personal favorite

One of my favorite activity in Hong Kong (and even more so in Mainland China) is checking translations (on signs, restaurant menus,…). I know. That does not sound really exciting, but I have been having a lot of laughs from that activity.

Now. I think I have found the pearl. Not only is the translation wrong in a linguistic sense… It just comes out really weird, having no connection with the original message, and it seems to me promoting fake goods, saying that with a bit of imagination they are as good as real ones! A funny statement, especially in Hong Kong were fake goods are a everywhere.

Hong Kong sign translation

(The idea behind the sign in Chinese is something like “Take care of nature”)

Buy on Hong Kong Now Broadband TV: Short Review

I discovered yesterday that I could buy stuff on my broadband TV access. I had no idea and I am not sure when it was launched. Here is what PCCW – Now Broadband TV says about the new channel (that channel 501 for those using the service):

A new shopping concept has hit town!

A PCCW service: now shop (channel 501) offers you local and Hollywood hottest DVDs, top-selling books, console games, electronics , lifestyle products and other services including movie ticketing and the No.1 Shopping Gallery. The new Stock Market Express, the new pay service providing Real-time stock quotes , FX spot rates and Gold prices for you to grasp every investment opportunity.

I have been taking a few pictures of the interface (accessible on Flickr)and I prepared a small presentation where I put my thoughts about the service. I also reviewed some elements of the interface from a usability perspective.

I prepared all this pretty quickly and did not do research about similar services in other countries. It is quite rough, but I hope it can be interesting to some and a basis for discussion on the topic of buying through interactive TV.

[slideshare id=124500&doc=hong-kong-now-tv-shop4606&w=425]

Let me know your thoughts…

The 80/20 Rule Misunderstanding

I started reading the book “The Long Tail” from Chris Anderson. It is a great easy read I find that aims at challenging the way business is done and highlight the opportunities created by new technologies. Very inspiring.

Yesterday, I was reading the part where Chris Anderson discusses the so-called “death” of the 80/20 rule. Very interestingly he states in this part that many people misunderstand that 80/20 rule. Here is what he says:

The 80/20 Rule is chronically misunderstood, for three reasons. First, it’s almost never exactly 80/20. Most of the large-inventory market I’ve studied are 80/10 or even less. [...Second], the 80 and the 20 are percentages of different things, and thus don’t need to equal 100. One is a percentage of products, the other a percentage of sales. [...] Finally, the Rule is misunderstood because people use it to describe different phenomena. The classic definition is about products and revenues, but the Rule can just as equally be applied to products and profits.

It is pretty amusing that the same day I received a direct marketing ad for a joint offer from DBS and SK-II that totally misuses the 80/20 Rule just as it is explained in the book. Here is what the ad copy says:

Latest research revealed that skin age is mastered by a “20:80 Principle”. Natural biological ageing accounts for only 20% of skin changes, while 80% is induced by our living habits and skincare regimen. With SK-II Bio Technology, you can have control on your beauty.

SK-II Direct Marketing

So much for the “research” that “revealed that skin age was mastered by a 20:80 Principle”. A typical problem of a marketer wanting to sound technical, expert and scientific, but does not do the homework… I hope the actual research at SK-II is a bit more thorough than that…

At least this example shows that the content in Chris Anderson’s book is VERY relevant to the reality today. A great read!

Funny Company Name

Many small companies in Hong Kong are hasty when choosing their company names, especially the translation of the name in English. What of a restaurant called “Eat Well Restaurant” or “Lucky Restaurant”. Below, I just wanted to highlight an example that I find particularly funny.

Plan B Design Lab Hong Kong

An interior design company called “Plan B Design Lab”… “Plan B”!!?? Does that mean that you need to have tried another design company first and then you can ask for their services if the first designer failed and messed up your apartment?

Psychobserver is proudly powered by WordPress
Entries (RSS) and Comments (RSS).